| [Table 2] Template for white papers for crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens | |||||
| Template for white papers for crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens [abstract] | |||||
| General information | |||||
| 00 Table of content | boolean true | ||||
| 01 Date of notification | date | ||||
| 02 Statement in accordance with Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | boolean true | ||||
| 03 Compliance statement in accordance with Article 6(6) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | boolean true | ||||
| 04 Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (a), (b), (c), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | boolean true | ||||
| 05 Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), point (d), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | boolean true | ||||
| 06 Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (e) and (f), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | boolean true | ||||
| SUMMARY | |||||
| 07 Warning in accordance with Article 6(7), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | boolean true | This summary should be read as an introduction to the crypto-asset white paper. The prospective holder should base any decision to purchase this crypto –asset on the content of the crypto-asset white paper as a whole and not on the summary alone. The offer to the public of this crypto-asset does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase financial instruments and any such offer or solicitation can be made only by means of a prospectus or other offer documents pursuant to the applicable national law. This crypto-asset white paper does not constitute a prospectus as referred to in Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council or any other offer document pursuant to Union or national law. |
|||
| 08 Characteristics of the crypto-asset | textBlock | HALO is not pegged to any currency, is not redeemable, and is not intended as a medium of exchange outside the project ecosystem. HALO functions as the network's utility token and is used for bonding, incentives and governance within the Warden Halo ecosystem. In particular, it has the following core functions: - It is a bonding token: operators and other participants bond (lock) HALO to become eligible to perform certain roles within the network, such as serving inference or verifying work in designated roles or tiers. Bonding gates role eligibility; it is not a validation or consensus role and is not subject to consensus-related slashing. - It is the protocol's incentive asset: newly issued HALO is distributed to reward participation in defined network activities, such as serving inference, verifying work, and bonding to perform roles. - It confers protocol governance voting and delegation rights, including over bonding requirements, the incentive (emissions) schedule, treasury, and rotation of the off-chain facilitator service. Starting total supply: 1,000,000,000 HALO. Maximum supply: 2,000,000,000 HALO (hard cap). Token type: ERC-20 token on Base (not a native gas token). Decimals: 18. New HALO is issued at an annual inflation rate of approximately 12%, distributed as incentives for participation in network activities, until the maximum supply of 2,000,000,000 HALO is reached, after which no further HALO is issued and total supply is fixed. |
|||
| 09 Further information about utility tokens | textBlock | ||||
| 10 Key information about the offer to the public or admission to trading | textBlock | The starting total supply is 1,000,000,000 HALO, rising to a maximum supply of 2,000,000,000 HALO through annual issuance of approximately 12%. The circulating supply at listing is indicative and comprises principally the airdrop tranche of the Community & Ecosystem allocation together with the 14-day LP incentive (0.01% of the starting supply); the Liquidity & Market-Making pool is locked for 10 years, the Treasury is DAO-gated, and Core Contributor tokens are subject to a 12-month cliff followed by 24-month linear vesting, so exact circulating figures at listing are to be confirmed. Token Listing Date for EU: 14 August 2026. Distribution will occur via direct listing on centralized and decentralized exchanges; no public sale, IDO or IEO has been conducted. The fully diluted valuation is not pre-determined; price is established by market price discovery on listing. ProtoWardo Ltd expects the token to be admitted to trading on leading EU-based crypto-asset platforms that operate in full compliance with MiCAR. |
|||
| Part A - Information about offeror or person seeking admission to trading | |||||
| A.1 Name | text | ||||
| A.2 Legal form | text | ||||
| A.3 Registered address | |||||
| Registered addess | text | ||||
| Country | enumeration | ||||
| Sub-division | text | ||||
| A.4 Head office | |||||
| Head office | text | ||||
| Country | enumeration | ||||
| Sub-division | text | ||||
| A.5 Registration date | date | ||||
| A.6 Legal entity identifier | LEI | ||||
| A.7 Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | text | ||||
| A.8 Contact telephone number | text | ||||
| A.9 E-mail address | text | ||||
| A.10 Response time (days) | integer | ||||
| A.11 Parent company | text | ||||
| A.12 Members of the management body | |||||
| Member #1 | id | 1 | |||
| Identity | text | ||||
| Business address | text | ||||
| Function | text | ||||
| Member #2 | id | 2 | |||
| Identity | text | ||||
| Business address | text | ||||
| Function | text | ||||
| A.13 Business activity | textBlock | ||||
| A.14 Parent company business activity | textBlock | ||||
| A.15 Newly established | boolean | ||||
| A.16 Financial condition for the past three years | textBlock | ||||
| A.17 Financial condition since registration | textBlock | ||||
| Part B - Information about issuer, if different from offeror or person seeking admission to trading | |||||
| B.1 Issuer different from offerror or person seeking admission to trading | boolean | ||||
| B.2 Name | N/A | . | |||
| B.3 Legal form | N/A | . | |||
| B.4 Registered address | |||||
| Registered addess | N/A | . | |||
| Country | N/A | . | |||
| Sub-division | N/A | . | |||
| B.5 Head office | |||||
| Head office | N/A | . | |||
| Country | N/A | . | |||
| Sub-division | N/A | . | |||
| B.6 Registration date | N/A | . | |||
| B.7 Legal entity identifier | N/A | . | |||
| B.8 Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | N/A | . | |||
| B.9 Parent company | N/A | . | |||
| B.10 Members of the management body | |||||
| Member #1 | N/A | . | |||
| Identity | N/A | . | |||
| Business address | N/A | . | |||
| Function | N/A | . | |||
| B.11 Business activity | N/A | . | |||
| B.12 Parent company business activity | N/A | . | |||
| Part C - Information about the operator of the trading platform in cases where it draws up the crypto-asset white paper and information about other persons drawing the crypto-asset white paper pursuant to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | |||||
| C.1 Name | N/A | . | |||
| C.2 Legal form | N/A | . | |||
| C.3 Registered address | |||||
| Registered address | N/A | . | |||
| Country | N/A | . | |||
| Sub-division | N/A | . | |||
| C.4 Head office | |||||
| Head office | N/A | . | |||
| Country | N/A | . | |||
| Sub-division | N/A | . | |||
| C.5 Registration date | N/A | . | |||
| C.6 Legal entity identifier | N/A | . | |||
| C.7 Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | N/A | . | |||
| C.8 Parent company | N/A | . | |||
| C.9 Reason for crypto-asset white paper preparation | N/A | . | |||
| C.10 Members of the management body | |||||
| Member #1 | N/A | . | |||
| Identity | N/A | . | |||
| Business address | N/A | . | |||
| Function | N/A | . | |||
| C.11 Operator business activity | N/A | . | |||
| C.12 Parent company business activity | N/A | . | |||
| C.13 Other persons drawing up the crypto-asset white paper according to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | N/A | . | |||
| C.14 Reason for drawing the white paper by persons referred to in Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | N/A | . | |||
| Part D - Information about other token project | |||||
| D.1 Crypto-asset project name | text | ||||
| D.2 Crypto-asset name | text | ||||
| D.3 Abbreviation | text | ||||
| D.4 Crypto-asset project description | textBlock | A peer-to-peer compute market has an obvious problem: how does a requester know the operator actually ran the model that was paid for? SPEX (Statistical Proof of Execution) solves this. SPEX fingerprints every computation as a compact (~1 KB) Bloom filter, allowing any independent operator to detect cheating statistically in milliseconds, without slow zero-knowledge proofs or hardware enclaves. The mesh is the product; SPEX is why the mesh can exist. HALO is the network's utility token, used for bonding, incentives and governance. HALO is not a payment token: requesters pay for inference and verification in USDC, and operators and verifiers are paid in USDC. Operators and other participants bond HALO to become eligible to perform certain network roles, and participants earn incentives in newly issued HALO for taking part in network activities. The protocol issues new HALO at an annual inflation rate of approximately 12%, subject to a maximum supply of 2,000,000,000 HALO, distributed as incentives for participation, after which issuance ceases. Core components: - Warden Halo network: a peer-to-peer compute marketplace for verified AI inference, deployed on Base, with USDC settlement, x402 and direct-deposit payment paths, and swarm verification. - SPEX (Statistical Proof of Execution): a cryptographic verification mechanism that fingerprints computation as a Bloom filter and enforces honesty through reputation rather than capital slashing. - Settlement and protocol contracts on Base: settlement escrow, the WardenX402Splitter, a bonding and incentive-distribution contract, and a token issuance (emissions) contract enforcing the maximum supply cap. - Operator and requester tooling: CLI and framework plugins for serving and consuming inference. The protocol is deployed on Base because Base offers fast finality and near-zero gas costs, and because EIP-712 enables free off-chain coordination. The broader Warden ecosystem already processes over 60 million autonomous tasks across more than 20 million users. |
|||
| D.5 Details of all natural or legal persons involved in implementation of crypto-asset project | |||||
| Person #1 | id | 1 | |||
| Type of person | enumeration | ||||
| Name of person | text | ||||
| Business address of person | text | ||||
| Domicile of company | enumeration | ||||
| Person #2 | id | 2 | |||
| Type of person | enumeration | ||||
| Name of person | text | ||||
| Business address of person | text | ||||
| Domicile of company | enumeration | ||||
| D.6 Utility token classification | boolean | ||||
| D.7 Key features of goods or services for utility token projects | text | ||||
| D.8 Plans for the token | |||||
| Description of past milestones | textBlock | The architecture is composed of: a settlement layer of smart contracts on Base (settlement escrow, WardenX402Splitter, a bonding and incentive-distribution contract, and a token issuance (emissions) contract); an off-chain coordination layer using EIP-712 signatures for free request/accept/verdict messaging; the SPEX verification mechanism (Bloom-filter fingerprints with reputation-based enforcement); an identity layer using ERC-8004 for pseudonymous, on-chain agent reputation; and operator/requester tooling (CLI and framework plugins). Token allocation (indicative). Starting supply: 1,000,000,000 HALO. The allocations below apply to the starting supply. Subsequent issuance, up to the maximum supply of 2,000,000,000 HALO, is distributed as incentives for participation in network activities at an annual inflation rate of approximately 12%. - Community & Ecosystem: 35% of starting supply (350,000,000 HALO) — airdrop to real HALO users plus a 14-day LP incentive (0.01% of the starting supply). - Core Contributors: 25% of starting supply (250,000,000 HALO) — core team and early contributors; 12-month cliff, then 24-month linear vest. - Treasury: 25% of starting supply (250,000,000 HALO) — development, integrations, infrastructure spend; DAO-gated release. - Liquidity & Market-Making: 15% of starting supply (150,000,000 HALO) — HALO side of the primary liquidity pool (locked 10 years) plus reserves. Past milestones (Q2 2026): litepaper published; full whitepaper, first alpha on Base mainnet (anyone can serve or consume verified inference with real USDC), and public roadmap; SPEX Bloom-filter verification, x402 and direct-deposit payment paths live. |
|||
| Description of future milestones | textBlock | - Q3 2026: HALO admission to trading on a MiCAR-authorised venue (14 August 2026); bonding and issuance-funded incentives live; emissions schedule active; swarm verification; ERC-8004 identity integration. - Q4 2026: operator-network scaling; free provider-auditing tooling; optional TEE-isolated private-inference tier; on-chain governance. - 2027 and beyond: general availability; optional capital-gated high-value verification tiers. |
|||
| D.9 Resource allocation | text | ||||
| D.10 Planned use of collected funds or other tokens | text | ||||
| Part E - Information about offer to public of other tokens or their admission to trading | |||||
| E.1 Public offering or admission to trading | enumeration | ||||
| E.2 Reasons for public offer or admission to trading | textBlock | ||||
| E.3 Fundraising target | |||||
| Target expressed in currency | monetary | EUR | |||
| Target expressed in units | decimal | ||||
| Target expressed in digital token identifier | text | ||||
| E.4 Minimum subscription goals | |||||
| Goals expressed in currency | monetary | EUR | |||
| Goals expressed in units | decimal | ||||
| Goals expressed in digital token identifier | text | ||||
| E.5 Maximum subscription goals | |||||
| Goasl expressed in currency | monetary | EUR | |||
| Goals expressed in units | decimal | ||||
| Goals expressed in digital token identifier | text | ||||
| E.6 Oversubscription acceptance | boolean | ||||
| E.7 Oversubscription allocation | text | ||||
| Issue price details | |||||
| E.8 Issue price | decimal | ||||
| E.9 Official currency determining issue price | enumeration | ||||
| E.9 Any other tokens determining issue price | text | ||||
| E.10 Subscription fee | |||||
| Fee expressed in currency | monetary | EUR | |||
| Fee expressed in units | decimal | ||||
| Fee expressed in digital token identifier | text | ||||
| E.11 Offer price determination method | text | ||||
| E.12 Total number of offered or traded other tokens | integer | ||||
| E.13 Targeted holders | enumeration | ||||
| E.14 Holder restrictions | text | ||||
| E.15 Reimbursement notice | boolean true | ||||
| E.16 Refund mechanism | textBlock | ||||
| E.17 Refund timeline | text | ||||
| E.18 Offer phases | textBlock | ||||
| E.19 Early purchase discount | textBlock | ||||
| E.20 Time-limited offer | boolean | ||||
| E.21 Subscription period beginning | date | ||||
| E.22 Subscription period end | date | ||||
| E.23 Safeguarding arrangements for offered funds or other tokens | textBlock | ||||
| E.24 Payment methods for other token purchase | textBlock | ||||
| E.25 Value transfer methods for reimbursement | textBlock | ||||
| E.26 Right of withdrawal | textBlock | ||||
| E.27 Transfer of purchased other tokens | textBlock | ||||
| E.28 Transfer time schedule | text | ||||
| E.29 Purchaser's technical requirements | textBlock | ||||
| Other token services provider characteristics | |||||
| E.30 Other token service provider (CASP) name | text | ||||
| E.31 CASP identifier | LEI | ||||
| E.32 Placement form | enumeration | ||||
| Trading platforms characteristics | |||||
| E.33 Trading platforms name | text | ||||
| E.34 Trading platforms market identifier code (MIC) | text | ||||
| E.35 Trading platforms access | text | ||||
| E.36 Involved costs | textBlock | ||||
| E.37 Offer expenses | textBlock | No offer expenses are charged to investors by the issuer in connection with the admission to trading of HALO. | |||
| E.38 Conflicts of interest | textBlock | ||||
| E.39 Applicable law | textBlock | ||||
| E.40 Competent court | textBlock | ||||
| Part F - Information about other tokens | |||||
| F.1 Crypto-asset type | text | ||||
| F.2 Other token functionality | textBlock | - Bonding: operators and other participants bond (lock) HALO to become eligible to perform certain roles within the network, such as serving inference or verifying work in designated roles or tiers. Bonding gates role eligibility; it is not a consensus role and is not subject to consensus slashing. Bonded HALO is locked for the duration of the bond and any applicable cooldown, and is returnable on good-standing exit. - Incentives: HALO is the protocol's incentive asset. Newly issued HALO is distributed to reward participation in defined network activities (such as serving inference, verifying work, and bonding to perform roles), funded by protocol token issuance at an annual inflation rate of approximately 12%. - Governance: enables voting and delegation over protocol parameters, bonding requirements, the incentive (emissions) schedule, treasury and facilitator rotation. |
|||
| F.3 Planned application of functionalities | textBlock | Current functionality (launch): USDC-settled inference and verification (x402 and direct-deposit paths); protocol fee routing to the treasury; bonding to perform network roles; issuance-funded participation incentives; token issuance per the emissions schedule. Planned functionality expansion: - Q3 2026: bonding and issuance-funded incentives live; emissions schedule active; swarm-verification fee tiers; ERC-8004 reputation-weighted operator pricing. - Q4 2026: on-chain governance over bonding, incentive (emissions) and treasury parameters; optional TEE-isolated private-inference tier. - 2027 and beyond: optional capital-gated high-value verification tiers. |
|||
| A description of the characteristics of the other token, including the data necessary for classification of the crypto-asset white paper in the register referred to in Article 109 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, as specified in accordance with paragraph 8 of that Article | |||||
| F.4 Type of crypto-asset white paper | enumeration | ||||
| F.5 Type of submission | enumeration | ||||
| F.6 Other token characteristics | textBlock | Technical characteristics: - Network: Base (Ethereum Layer-2, OP Stack optimistic rollup) - Token Standard: ERC-20 (not a native gas token) - Starting Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 HALO - Maximum Supply: 2,000,000,000 HALO - Decimals: 18 - Hard Cap: Yes — maximum supply of 2,000,000,000 HALO; token issuance ceases permanently once the cap is reached - Token Contract: [HALO ERC-20 contract address on Base — to be published prior to admission to trading] - Blockchain Explorer: https://basescan.org Inflation mechanism: HALO is issued at an annual inflation rate of approximately 12%, calculated on total supply, and distributed as incentives for participation in network activities. Issuance is enforced by the token contract and stops permanently once total supply reaches the maximum of 2,000,000,000 HALO. Starting from 1,000,000,000 HALO, the maximum supply is reached in approximately six years at this rate, after which total supply is fixed. All issuance is transparent and verifiable on-chain. Interoperability: HALO is an ERC-20 on Base and is compatible with standard EVM tooling and Base-native decentralized exchanges and bridges. |
|||
| F.7 Commercial name or trading name | text | ||||
| F.8 Website of the issuer | text | ||||
| F.9 Starting date of offer to the public or admission to trading | date | ||||
| F.10 Publication date | date | ||||
| F.11 Any other services provided by the issuer | textBlock | - Warden Halo network: a peer-to-peer compute marketplace for verified AI inference, with USDC settlement, x402 and direct-deposit payment paths, swarm verification, and SPEX-based verification. - Operator and requester tooling: CLI and framework plugins compatible with common agent frameworks and inference runtimes for serving and consuming inference. - Warden App: an AI-powered crypto interface offering multi-chain token swaps, yield optimization, portfolio management, AI research agents, and trading. - Custody and identity infrastructure: embedded wallets with private keys held in hardware-isolated enclaves (TEE) and ERC-8004 on-chain agent identity. |
|||
| F.12 Language or languages of white paper | text | ||||
| F.13 Digital token identifier code used to uniquely identify the crypto-asset or each of the several crypto assets to which the white paper relates, where available | text | ||||
| F.14 Functionally fungible group digital token identifier, where available | text | Not applicable | |||
| F.15 Voluntary data flag | boolean | ||||
| F.16 Personal data flag | boolean | ||||
| F.17 LEI eligibility | boolean | ||||
| F.18 Home member state | enumeration | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #1 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #2 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #3 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #4 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #5 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #6 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #7 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #8 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #9 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #10 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #11 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #12 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #13 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #14 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #15 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #16 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #17 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #18 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #19 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #20 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #21 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #22 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #23 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #24 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #25 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #26 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #27 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #28 | enumerationSet | ||||
| F.19 Host member states #29 | enumerationSet | ||||
| Part G - Information on rights and obligations attached to other tokens | |||||
| G.1 Purchaser rights and obligations | textBlock | Token-holder obligations: comply with applicable laws and regulations in the holder's jurisdiction; maintain secure wallet access and private-key management; self-custody (the holder is responsible for security); and report and pay taxes as required by local law. |
|||
| G.2 Exercise of rights and obligations | textBlock | - Bonding: lock HALO in the bonding contract to become eligible to perform designated network roles; bonded HALO is locked for the duration of the bond and any applicable cooldown, and is returnable on good-standing exit. - Incentives claim: eligible participants claim accrued HALO incentives from the incentive-distribution contract, per the emissions schedule. - Governance: vote on proposals through on-chain governance; delegate voting power where supported; proposals visible on the governance interface. - Transfer: standard ERC-20 transfer transactions; exchange deposits/withdrawals; bridging via supported bridges. |
|||
| G.3 Conditions for modifications of rights and obligations | textBlock | Modification limitations: core token properties (decimals, the maximum supply cap) cannot be changed arbitrarily; the token issuance (emissions) logic and the maximum supply cap are contract-enforced; bonding requirements and the incentive schedule are governed parameters; the off-chain facilitator handles signature validation only, never holds funds, and can be rotated by governance. Token holders accept that protocol evolution may result in changes to functionality over time. |
|||
| G.4 Future public offers | textBlock | ||||
| G.5 Issuer retained other token | integer | ||||
| G.6 Utility token classification | boolean | ||||
| G.7 Key features of goods or services utility tokens | text | ||||
| G.8 Utility tokens redemption | text | ||||
| G.9 Non-trading request | boolean | ||||
| G.10 Other tokens purchase or sale modalities | text | ||||
| G.11 Other tokens transfer restrictions | text | ||||
| G.12 Supply adjustment protocols | boolean | ||||
| G.13 Supply adjustment mechanisms | text | ||||
| Other token schemes details | |||||
| G.14 Token value protection schemes | boolean | ||||
| G.15 Token value protection schemes description | textBlock | ||||
| G.16 Compensation schemes | boolean | ||||
| G.17 Compensation schemes description | textBlock | ||||
| G.18 Applicable law | textBlock | ||||
| G.19 Competent court | textBlock | ||||
| Part H – Information on underlying technology | |||||
| H.1 Distributed ledger technology (DTL) | text | ||||
| H.2 Protocols and technical standards | text | - ERC-20 (HALO token standard), with a contract-enforced maximum supply cap - EIP-712 typed-data signatures (free off-chain coordination of requests, acceptances and verdicts) - x402 (the HTTP 402 payment standard) for pay-per-request inference and verification flows - ERC-8004 (lightweight on-chain identity and reputation for autonomous agents) - SPEX (Statistical Proof of Execution — Bloom-filter execution fingerprints) - OP Stack / Base Layer-2 conventions; Merkle-root batch settlement - XBRL/iXBRL compliance for this white paper Interoperability protocols: standard EVM tooling and Base-native decentralized exchanges and bridges. |
|||
| H.3 Technology used | textBlock | The architecture stacks purpose-built layers: Settlement layer (Base smart contracts): a settlement escrow holds requester USDC; the WardenX402Splitter atomically routes pay-per-request payments (90% to the operator in USDC, 10% to the protocol treasury in USDC); a bonding and incentive-distribution contract manages bonded HALO, role eligibility, and the distribution of participation incentives from newly issued HALO; a token issuance (emissions) contract mints HALO at the scheduled annual rate of approximately 12% up to the maximum supply of 2,000,000,000 HALO, after which minting is disabled. Batch settlement uses a single Merkle-root transaction (~200,000 gas regardless of whether there are 10 or 10,000 verdicts). Verification mechanism (SPEX): a model's inference output is not bit-deterministic across hardware, but its token distribution is stable across honest runs (typically 90%+ overlap). The requester inserts every emitted token ID into a ~1 KB Bloom filter that ships with the result; an independent verifier re-runs the model and checks how many of its own tokens are members of the filter. Honest runs land at roughly 90%+ overlap, pure fabrication at roughly the Bloom false-positive rate (~1%), with a configurable acceptance threshold typically around 70%. Forging a Bloom filter that hits a specific unknown token sequence is as hard as predicting the model's output, which requires actually running the model. Coordination and settlement timing: request, acceptance and verdict are exchanged off-chain via EIP-712 signatures (free, instant). A single settlement transaction lands on Base in approximately 2 seconds for a fraction of a cent. Total time from request to verified result is typically 4–12 seconds, bounded by the inference re-run rather than the chain. Swarm verification (splitting a verification into hundreds or thousands of micro-tasks) completes in under three minutes with hundreds of independent checks. Identity and reputation (ERC-8004): agents register a pseudonymous on-chain identity; verification history and accuracy become a permanent, queryable record. It is not a KYC gate; good actors accumulate trust and bad actors accumulate evidence. Custody (embedded wallets): operators authenticate through their Warden account (email, social login or passkey). Private keys are generated and held exclusively inside a hardware-isolated enclave (TEE); the operator's machine never holds the key. Policy-based controls (MFA, time-delays, co-approval) protect high-value operations. Privacy (three layers): every prompt is encrypted to the specific operator's public key using ECIES; batch fragmentation means each operator sees only one task out of many; optional TEE isolation (Intel TDX, NVIDIA Confidential Computing, AMD SEV-SNP) is available for the most sensitive work. Documentation: https://docs.wardenprotocol.org. Network and contracts are deployed on Base (https://basescan.org). |
|||
| H.4 Consensus mechanism | text | ||||
| H.5 Incentive mechanisms and applicable fees | text | - Operators (inference): paid in USDC, typically 90% of each pay-per-request payment, settled instantly. - Verifiers: paid in USDC for checking work; honest verdicts also earn +1 reputation, while false "invalid" verdicts incur a 7-day settlement cooldown and −10 reputation. - Participants: receive incentives in newly issued HALO for participating in network activities (such as serving inference, verifying work, and bonding to perform roles), funded by protocol token issuance at an annual inflation rate of approximately 12% (until the maximum supply is reached). Applicable fees: inference and verification fees are paid in USDC; a protocol slice (e.g. 10% on the x402 path) accrues to the protocol treasury in USDC; gas on Base is paid in ETH and is near-zero. Participation incentives are funded by token issuance up to the maximum supply; there are no validator rewards, because HALO has no validators. |
|||
| H.6 Use of distributed ledger technology | boolean | ||||
| H.7 DLT functionality description | textBlock | - USDC settlement: escrow of requester funds and atomic payment splitting to operators and the protocol treasury. - Bonding: management of bonded HALO and role eligibility for operators and verifiers. - Token issuance and participation incentives: minting of new HALO per the emissions schedule (capped at the maximum supply) and distribution as incentives to participants. - Verification settlement: on-chain commitment of SPEX verdicts, including Merkle-root batch settlement for scale. - Identity and reputation: ERC-8004 agent identity and queryable reputation records. - Governance: on-chain proposal submission, token-weighted voting, and time-locked parameter changes. Live explorer: https://basescan.org. Documentation: Halo Guide (https://runhalo.xyz/guides). |
|||
| Other token audit details | |||||
| H.8 Audit | boolean | ||||
| H.9 Audit outcome | textBlock | - Warden Protocol Audit (2024) — Auditor: Informal Systems. Scope: core Warden Protocol components, including SPEX-related logic. Result: findings addressed and remediated. Report available in project documentation. - Warden Halo smart-contract audit (2026) — Scope: the HALO ERC-20 contract (including the maximum supply cap and issuance logic). Result: completed prior to admission to trading; no critical vulnerabilities present. Ongoing security measures: open-source code enabling community review; continuous integration testing; bug-bounty program; regular dependency updates. |
|||
| Part I - Information on risks | |||||
| I.1 Offer-related risks | textBlock | ||||
| I.2 Issuer-related risks | textBlock | ||||
| I.3 Other tokens-related risks | textBlock | Liquidity Risk: Crypto-assets may suffer from low liquidity, making it difficult to buy or sell large amounts without affecting the market price, which could lead to significant losses, especially in fast-moving market conditions. Custodial Risk: Risks associated with the theft of crypto-assets from exchanges or wallets, loss of private keys, or failure of custodial services, which can result in the irreversible loss of crypto-assets. Inflation and Dilution Risk: HALO is issued at an annual inflation rate of approximately 12% until the maximum supply of 2,000,000,000 HALO is reached. Holders who do not participate (and so do not receive incentives) are diluted over time as their proportional share of total supply decreases, and the distribution of newly issued HALO as incentives may create selling pressure. The real value of participation incentives depends on market price, participation levels, and network usage, and is not guaranteed. Bonding Risk: HALO that is bonded to perform network roles is locked and illiquid for the duration of the bond and any applicable cooldown, during which it cannot be transferred or sold and remains exposed to price movements. Bonding does not guarantee incentives or any return, and bonding requirements and eligible roles may be changed through governance. Smart Contract Risk: HALO and the Warden Halo settlement, issuance and bonding contracts are code running on Base. Bugs or vulnerabilities in the code — including in the ERC-20 (and its supply-cap and issuance logic), the splitter, the emissions contract, or the bonding and incentive-distribution contract — can expose users to potential hacks and exploits, leading to the loss of crypto-assets or unintended behaviour despite audits. A flaw in the issuance or cap logic could, in particular, result in incorrect supply. Regulatory and Tax Risk: Changes in the regulatory environment for crypto-assets (such as consumer protection, taxation, and anti-money laundering requirements) could affect the use, value, or legality of crypto-assets in a given jurisdiction. Counterparty Risk: In cases where crypto-assets are used in contractual agreements or held on exchanges, there is a risk that the counterparty may fail to fulfill their obligations due to insolvency, compliance issues, or fraud, resulting in loss of crypto-assets. Reputational Risk: Association with illicit activities, high-profile thefts, or technological failures can damage the reputation of certain crypto-assets, impacting user trust and market value. Stablecoin and Market-Infrastructure Dependency Risk: Settlement depends on USDC and trading depends on Base-native exchanges; de-pegging of USDC, liquidity shortfalls, or exchange failures could impair settlement, trading and the value of incentives. Self-Custody Risk: Token holders are responsible for private-key security; lost keys mean lost tokens permanently with no recovery mechanism. No Investor Protections: HALO is not covered by deposit guarantee schemes or investor compensation schemes; there is no insurance on holdings. |
|||
| I.4 Project implementation-related risks | textBlock | ||||
| I.5 Technology-related risks | textBlock | Settlement and Transaction Finality: Base provides fast confirmation, but as an optimistic rollup it relies on Ethereum for final settlement and on a fraud-proof/challenge mechanism. Once a transaction is confirmed it cannot be reversed; crypto-assets sent to a wrong address cannot be retrieved. Withdrawals from Base to Ethereum may be subject to challenge-window delays. Sequencer and Layer-2 Dependency Risk: Base currently relies on a sequencer to order transactions. Sequencer downtime, censorship or failure could delay or disrupt settlement, issuance, bonding and trading. HALO depends entirely on the continued operation and security of Base and Ethereum; any failure, halt, reorganisation or critical bug in either could affect HALO. Scaling Limitations and Transaction Fees: As the number of users and transactions grows, network congestion on Base or Ethereum could increase transaction fees and slow processing times, affecting usability and costs. Network Attacks and Cyber Security Risks: The network can be vulnerable to a variety of cyber-attacks, including attacks on the sequencer, bridges, or exchange liquidity, as well as DDoS attacks. These can disrupt operations and compromise integrity. Bugs in Core Code: Even with thorough testing, unknown bugs may exist in the HALO contract or the settlement, issuance and bonding contracts, which could be exploited. Continuous code review, audit trails, and a bug-bounty program are essential to identify and rectify such vulnerabilities promptly. Smart Contract Security Risk: Bugs or vulnerabilities in smart-contract code can expose users to potential hacks and exploits. Despite audits, unknown bugs may exist, and any flaw can lead to loss of crypto-assets or unauthorized access. Dependency on Underlying Technology: The protocol relies on Base, Ethereum, USDC, x402 facilitators, Base-native decentralized exchanges, embedded-wallet custody and third-party AI inference providers, which may themselves be vulnerable to attacks, outages, or other interferences. The protocol also depends on third-party libraries and upstream open-source dependencies. Risk of Technological Disruption: Technological advancements such as quantum computing could make components insecure or obsolete, potentially leading to theft or loss of crypto-assets or compromised integrity. Governance Risk: Faulty governance models can lead to ineffective decision-making, slow responses to issues, and potential disproportionate influence by a group of stakeholders, including over the bonding requirements, the incentive schedule and treasury. Anonymity and Privacy Risk: The transparency of public ledgers can expose transaction patterns; addresses may be linked to activity, exposing holders to phishing, fraud, or other malicious activities. SPEX privacy layers mitigate, but do not eliminate, exposure. Verification-Integrity Risk: SPEX relies on statistical token-distribution overlap; mis-calibrated thresholds, novel model behaviours, or coordinated provider tampering could in principle reduce verification reliability, though swarm verification across diverse providers is designed to surface such anomalies. Third-Party Risks: Crypto-assets rely on third-party services such as exchanges and wallet providers for trading and storage. These platforms can be susceptible to security breaches, operational failures, and regulatory non-compliance. |
|||
| I.6 Mitigation measures | textBlock | - Security: professional security audits (Informal Systems and the 2026 Warden Halo smart-contract audit); open-source code enabling community review; multi-signature and TEE-backed custody for critical operations; bug-bounty program; regular security assessments and updates. - Technical: proven technology stack (Base / EVM, ERC-20 with a contract-enforced supply cap, EIP-712); comprehensive testing and CI/CD pipelines; gradual rollout with alpha testing on mainnet; redundancy across independent operators; SPEX swarm verification for stronger statistical guarantees. - Operational: experienced team; geographic distribution reduces single points of failure; clear incident-response procedures. - Financial: protocol treasury (funded by the protocol fee slice in USDC) for stable runway; diversified inference and verification revenue; a contract-enforced maximum supply cap and conservative token-release schedule (cliffs, linear vesting, 10-year LP lock). - Governance: time-locked protocol changes; multi-signature requirements for critical operations; community oversight through open-source development; gradual decentralization roadmap. - Compliance: legal counsel for regulatory monitoring; geographic restrictions where required; adaptation to evolving regulatory frameworks. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consult financial and legal advisors before acquiring tokens. |
|||
| Part J - Information on the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impact on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts | |||||
| J.1 Adverse impacts on climate and other environment-related adverse impacts | textBlock | ||||
| Mandatory information on principal adverse impacts on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | |||||
| General information about adverse impacts | |||||
| S.1 Name | text | ||||
| S.2 Relevant legal entity identifier | text | ||||
| S.3 Name of the crypto-asset | text | ||||
| S.4 Consensus mechanism | text | ||||
| S.5 Incentive mechanisms and applicable fees | text | ||||
| S.6 Beginning of period to which disclosed information relates | date | ||||
| S.7 End of period to which disclosed information relates | date | ||||
| Mandatory key indicator | |||||
| S.8 Energy consumption | energy (kWh) | ||||
| Sources and methodologies | |||||
| S.9 Energy consumption sources and methodologies | textBlock | ||||
| Supplementary information on principal adverse impacts on climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of consensus mechanism | |||||
| Supplementary key indicators | |||||
| S.10 Renewable energy consumption | percent | ||||
| S.11 Energy intensity | energy (kWh) | ||||
| S.12 Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions - controlled | GHG emissions (tCO2e) | ||||
| S.13 Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - purchased | GHG emissions (tCO2e) | ||||
| S.14 GHG intensity | GHG emissions (tCO2e) | ||||
| Sources and methodologies | |||||
| S.15 Key energy sources and methodologies | textBlock | ||||
| S.16 Key GHG sources and methodologies | textBlock | ||||
| Optional information on principal adverse impacts on the climate and on other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | |||||
| Optional indicators | |||||
| S. 17 Energy mix | percent | ||||
| S.18 Energy use reduction | |||||
| Energy use reduction target (absolute value) | energy (kWh) | ||||
| Energy use reduction target (percentage) | percent | ||||
| S.19 Carbon intensity (kgCO2e/kWh) | decimal | ||||
| S.20 Scope 3 DLT GHG emissions - value chain | GHG emissions (tCO2e) | ||||
| S.21 GHG emissions reduction targets or commitments | textBlock | ||||
| S.22 Generation of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) | mass (tonnes) | ||||
| S.23 Non-recycled WEEE ratio | percent | ||||
| S.24 Generation of hazardous waste | mass (tonnes) | ||||
| S.25 Generation of waste (all types) | mass (tonnes) | ||||
| S.26 Non-recycled waste ratio (all types) | percent | ||||
| S.27 Waste intensity (all types) | mass (tonnes) | ||||
| S.28 Waste reduction targets or commitments (all types) | textBlock | ||||
| S.29 Impact of use of equipment on natural resources | textBlock | ||||
| S.30 Natural resources use reduction targets or commitments | textBlock | ||||
| S.31 Water use | volume (m3) | ||||
| S.32 Non recycled water ratio | percent | ||||
| Sources and methodologies | |||||
| S.33 Other energy sources and methodologies | textBlock | ||||
| S.34 Other GHG sources and methodologies | textBlock | ||||
| S.35 Waste sources and methodologies | textBlock | ||||
| S.36 Natural resources sources and methodologies | textBlock | ||||